The Anti-AI ETF: Investing in Tangible Assets Amidst Tech Dominance
Money

The Anti-AI ETF: Investing in Tangible Assets Amidst Tech Dominance

authorBy Scott Pape
DateAug 15, 2026
Read Time4 min

The Roundhill Heavy Assets and Low Obsolescence ETF (LOHA), launched in May 2026, presents an investment philosophy that diverges from the prevailing trend of software and artificial intelligence (AI) dominated equity markets. This unique fund, conceptualized by Josh Brown of Ritholtz Wealth Management, focuses on companies possessing substantial physical assets and established operational frameworks, aiming to provide a counterbalance to portfolios heavily skewed towards technological advancements. By investing in sectors characterized by tangible infrastructure and entrenched distribution, LOHA seeks to capture value in businesses less susceptible to rapid disruption by emerging technologies.

LOHA's strategy is built on the premise that businesses with significant physical footprints and operational complexities offer inherent competitive advantages that cannot be easily replicated by software-centric competitors. The fund's primary holdings, including Cummins, AutoZone, and TFI International, exemplify this approach by representing industries like engine manufacturing, automotive parts distribution, and freight transport. These companies rely on extensive physical networks and specialized manufacturing capabilities, providing a distinct investment profile compared to the high-growth, often volatile, AI and software sectors. Despite being marketed as an "anti-AI" fund, some of its core holdings, such as Cummins, paradoxically benefit from the AI boom by supplying essential infrastructure like backup generators to data centers, highlighting an interesting dynamic where the physical economy underpins the digital one.

The Strategic Rationale Behind Investing in Tangible Infrastructure

The core principle behind the Roundhill Heavy Assets and Low Obsolescence ETF (LOHA) revolves around the belief that companies with substantial physical infrastructure, entrenched distribution channels, and long-lasting capital possess a fundamental competitive edge. In an era dominated by rapid technological shifts and the pervasive influence of artificial intelligence, LOHA aims to offer investors a stable alternative by focusing on businesses whose value is rooted in tangible assets rather than easily reproducible software code. This strategic choice is designed to shield portfolios from the potential obsolescence risks associated with purely digital enterprises, where a competitor can quickly replicate or supersede existing intellectual property with new code. By investing in sectors that require significant capital expenditure and time to establish, LOHA targets companies with durable "physical moats" that deter new entrants and maintain long-term value.

The investment thesis suggests that a company's competitive position is significantly strengthened when it depends on physical scale, such as extensive manufacturing facilities, intricate distribution centers, vast truck fleets, or a nationwide network of retail locations. For instance, replicating the operational efficiency and market penetration of a company like AutoZone, with its extensive aftermarket auto parts network, would necessitate building thousands of stores and stocking a diverse inventory across numerous locations—a feat that no software startup could achieve merely through algorithmic innovation. Similarly, securing large-scale agreements, like Cummins' multi-year contracts for backup power generators crucial for AI data centers, demands established foundries, deep engineering expertise, and navigating complex regulatory environments, none of which can be conjured by a software model. These examples underscore LOHA's commitment to companies where physical presence and operational depth are paramount to their success and resilience.

Evaluating the Resilience of Physical Assets in a Dynamic Market

While the investment in heavy assets offers a unique hedge against the volatility of technology-driven markets, it is not without its challenges. Companies relying on significant physical infrastructure are inherently capital-intensive and often subject to cyclical economic trends and commodity price fluctuations. For example, a company like Lennox, a prominent holding in the LOHA ETF, experienced a considerable decline in residential revenues due to factors such as elevated mortgage rates and reduced consumer confidence. Similarly, the margins of a mining company like Newmont, another key holding, are closely tied to the volatile price of gold. These examples illustrate that while physical assets can offer stability, they also expose investors to operating leverage that can cut both ways, amplifying returns during economic upturns but also exacerbating losses during downturns.

LOHA's approach to portfolio management, which includes equal weighting and quarterly rebalancing of its 100 U.S. company holdings, serves to mitigate some of these risks. This mechanical rebalancing strategy ensures that the fund trims positions that have performed well and adds to those that have lagged, preventing over-reliance on any single winner. This behavior stands in stark contrast to cap-weighted technology indices, which often concentrate their exposure in a few dominant companies. Consequently, LOHA acts as a genuine diversifier at the business-model level, offering exposure to industries like engines, trucks, HVAC systems, and gold mining. While LOHA is still a relatively new fund with a short track record and liquidity considerations, it is primarily designed to provide diversification when market leadership shifts, rather than to lead an AI-driven rally. Therefore, investors should consider it as a strategic allocation, typically a small sleeve (3% to 7%) within a broader portfolio, to counteract the heavy tech overlap found in many conventional broad-market indices.

More Articles
Money
SpaceX's AI Ambition: A Bold Claim Against Tech Giants
Elon Musk asserts that SpaceX possesses a unique competitive advantage in AI, allowing it to deploy capital more efficiently than industry titans like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. This claim, based on leveraging its rocket engineering expertise for data center development, suggests a significantly faster return on investment in AI infrastructure, sparking debate among investors and analysts regarding its sustainability and scalability in the long term.
By Bola SokunbiAug 15, 2026
Money
Strategic Roth Conversions: Navigating Retirement Withdrawals
This article explores how converting traditional IRA funds to a Roth IRA during one's 60s can eliminate future Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) at age 73, granting retirees greater control over their withdrawals and tax obligations. It details the tax benefits of such conversions, particularly leveraging lower tax brackets before Social Security and RMDs increase income, and outlines the strategic steps involved, along with potential pitfalls like increased Medicare surcharges and the five-year rule for Roth earnings.
By Dave RamseyAug 15, 2026
Money
Rethinking Your Bond Investment: BSV Offers Stability Over BND's Long-Term Risk
Many investors unknowingly expose themselves to significant interest rate risk through default bond funds like Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). While BND and its short-term counterpart, Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV), offer similar yields and fees, BSV's focus on shorter maturities provides greater price stability. Over the past five years, BSV has delivered substantial gains, whereas BND has seen losses, highlighting the hidden risks of longer-duration bonds in a fluctuating interest rate environment. Understanding these differences is crucial for aligning bond holdings with individual financial goals and risk tolerance.
By Mr. Money MustacheAug 15, 2026
Money
DIVO vs. JEPI: Navigating Monthly Dividends and Capital Preservation
Investors seeking monthly income often weigh high yields against capital protection. This analysis compares two popular covered-call ETFs, DIVO and JEPI, highlighting their distinct strategies and performance. DIVO has demonstrated superior principal growth, while JEPI offers a higher forward yield. Understanding their different approaches to option writing and distribution consistency is crucial for investors aiming to balance income generation with long-term capital preservation.
By Mr. Money MustacheAug 15, 2026
Money
Beauty Retailer Douglas Adjusts Strategy Amid Store Closures and Market Shifts
Douglas Group, a veteran beauty retailer, is undergoing a strategic shift, closing 31 stores in the first nine months of fiscal 2026 and warning of more potential shutdowns. This move comes as the company faces dwindling sales and heightened price competition, pushing it to re-evaluate its physical presence and pivot towards a stronger e-commerce and omnichannel approach.
By Mr. Money MustacheAug 15, 2026